Forum:Which of the alignments is more human-centric?

Here's two ways of thought:

1. "Existence and morality is human centric. The ultimate goal is to improve human welfare, even at the expense of the Earth's welfare. Man is good and not fallen. Man is the answer to everything. What's good for Man must be good for the planet."

What is this in line with? LAW, CHAOS, or NEUTRAL?

2. "Existence is not human-centric and neither is morality. At the rate humans are going, Man could be the Earth's problem child, and it already is. Man is not fallen, but neither is he completely good. What's good for Man isn't necessarily good for the planet, and sometimes it may wreck the planet."

What is this in line with? LAW, CHAOS, or NEUTRAL?

For more information on what I'm talking about, click this link: http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/nature/nature_studies/nature-studies-by-michael-mccarthy-its-time-man-stopped-to-consider-earths-health-2218134.html GalaxiaWild 09:20, February 19, 2011 (UTC)