Thread:Sannse/@comment-1783453-20171027183043/@comment-23404162-20171103200741

And looking at the thread where it was argued, all I see are the same arguments we brought up and yet, because the Star Wars community is a more lucrative one, we're the Wikia that is forced to censor non-sexualized canonical images (look at Kugutsu where the figure is in a neutral position and the focal point of the image is not in the nudity) and they're allowed to keep up a piece of fanart that features a nipple as the focal point of the piece, drawn in a hyper-sexualized fashion (character is splayed prone, legs partially spread to indicate desire).

I could care less about the Giten sprites. It would be nice to not have them censored, sure, but whatever. I do care that the artist that is credited on nearly every single game in this franchise is having his designs censored because of the presence of a single body part, one that is not treated sexually in his designs, because they're monster designs that clearly delineate that these are unnatural beings.

This is a game franchise with over one hundred game titles within the bounds of its canon. That's not even counting the novels, comics, and animations its inspired. The fact that the seminal artist that has defined the artistic direction of this franchise cannot have his work displayed here is a joke.