Thread:Bluerfn/@comment-4522253-20171117210947/@comment-4522253-20171120043934

The authoritative nature of CSS pages is typically done for security enforcement and quality control of wikis with large volumes of traffic, for which this wiki qualifies. A typical user under most circumstances should not be able to "fine tune" CSS (or JavaScript, for the same reason) on a public community, as leaving that unprotected is an invitation to vandalism. If problems are found in the styling, it is highly appropriate to pass that along to an admin that can make a responsible decision. In absence of an admin, such requests can be sent to Special:Contact, where FANDOM Staff is empowered to alter global CSS (as are many FANDOM volunteers, such as Vanguard members).

If you don't want a sysop right, it would follow that you would not want the responsiblity of making sitewide styling changes. I can understand that position. However, others may well have the skill and desire to pursue or fulfil an admin or moderator role. One reason for the elimination of Lua in the capacity in which you've employed it is that it is not an easy thing for most users to maintain; being the Community Team staff member most conversant with Lua, I'm suggesting that it be removed from the equation in this case so that a general public can maintain templates. With the advent of Portable Infoboxes, Module:Gamebox can be eliminated entirely; this would be in the overall best interest for this communities long-term growth and development.